ELJ
Plzeň U20
Karlovy Vary U20
Prediction for Plzeň U20 — Karlovy Vary U20
50%
Read more
Mountfield HK vs České Budějovice: match prediction on 18 September 2026
Mountfield HK
České Budějovice
Prediction for
Win: Mountfield HK
59%
probability
Outcome probabilities (1X2) · by our model
59%
1
17%
X
24%
2
Prediction fixed and will not change after kick-off
Reasoning
Based on data as of 16 Sep, 17:13- Мунтфелд, last 5 games: 3 wins, 2 losses
- Ческе-Будеёвице, last 5 games: 3 wins, 2 losses
- Head-to-head: 16 games, Мунтфелд — 9, Ческе-Будеёвице — 7
Key factors
Form last 5 matches
Mountfield HK
LLWWL
2 wins · 3 losses
České Budějovice
WWWLW
4 wins · 1 loss
Head to head 24
14Mountfield HK
0Draw
10České Budějovice
- 11 JanČeské Budějovice — Mountfield HK5:1
- 30 Nov 2025Mountfield HK — České Budějovice4:2
- 21 Oct 2025České Budějovice — Mountfield HK0:3
- 12 Sep 2025Mountfield HK — České Budějovice3:4
- 28 Feb 2025České Budějovice — Mountfield HK1:3
Bookmaker market
No bookmaker data
More predictions
All match predictions
Analytical content. Not a call to gamble. 18+
Prediction commentary
Based on data as of 16 Sep, 17:13No match data exists for a Mountfield HK versus České Budějovice fixture on 18 September 2026. The available records state that the Extraliga 2026/27 season has not yet begun, and the date is in the future. Consequently, no score, goal scorers, or match events occurred.
The standings cited in the prompt place both teams in the bottom half of the table with zero points after zero matches. No games played, no points on the board. The teams are listed as having played no competitive fixtures of the current season.
The provided figures include head-to-head records from previous seasons, such as a 5-1 victory for České Budějovice in January 2026 and a 4-2 win for Mountfield HK in November 2025.
Any report claiming a draw or win for this date would be factually incorrect based on the timeline. The statistical models mentioned, predicting goals and probabilities, apply to future scenarios, not a completed event. The 2-2 claim is wrong.