ELJ
Prediction for Plzeň U20 — Karlovy Vary U20
50%
Read more
Zimbabwe
Australia
Prediction fixed and will not change after kick-off
Form last 5 matches
Head to head 6
Analytical content. Not a call to gamble. 18+
Prediction commentary
Based on data as of 18 Sep, 08:32Australia to win the series decider
Australia take a commanding 2-0 lead into the third ODI on 20 September 2026, and the form figures make that advantage look even more substantial. In the first two encounters they outscored Zimbabwe by 84 runs and 59 runs respectively, posting 356 and 294 while restricting their hosts to 272 and 235. Australia's recent record reinforces it: four wins from five matches, including victories over Bangladesh in both home and away fixtures. Zimbabwe have managed just one win in the same period, a narrow three-run success against Namibia, with defeats to South Africa and the Australians accounting for the other four results.
Travis Head's century in the opening match of this series proved decisive, and his presence in the lineup gives Australia a proven match-winner at this level. The innings not only helped seal the series but also demonstrated the kind of aggressive approach that has characterised Australia's batting throughout the tour. Glenn Maxwell added his own milestone by claiming his 200th ODI wicket in that same game, giving them depth with the bat and control in the middle overs. Zimbabwe will need to find a way to contain Head if they are to avoid a third consecutive defeat.
ODI history favours Australia, but T20s tell a different tale. In T20 internationals, Zimbabwe have won two of the last four meetings against Australia, including a dramatic 23-run victory in February 2026 at the ICC Men's T20 World Cup. Those results prove they can produce competitive contests across formats. However, the ODI format has been a different matter entirely, with Australia winning both previous encounters in this series by comfortable margins.
Australia's batting output over the last five matches totals 1454 runs at an average of 290.8 per game, while Zimbabwe have managed 965 runs across the same span, averaging 193. The gap in scoring volume is significant, and Australia's defensive record—conceding 1258 runs compared to Zimbabwe's 1196—suggests they are less vulnerable to pressure.
An Australia victory would not be guaranteed if they rotate their squad significantly, particularly if Head or Maxwell are rested. Zimbabwe have shown they can compete when conditions suit their style of play, and a pitch offering assistance to spinners or seam bowlers could level the playing field. If Australia fail to build substantial totals in the first two matches, as they did previously, the pressure would shift towards them. A narrow Zimbabwe victory would require them to exploit any weaknesses in Australia's bowling attack during the death overs.