Andebol 1
Prediction for Porto — ABC Braga
72%
Read more
Prediction for
Win: Litvínov U20
52%
probability
Outcome probabilities (1X2) · by our model
Prediction fixed and will not change after kick-off
Form last 5 matches
Head to head 5
Bookmaker market
No bookmaker data
Analytical content. Not a call to gamble. 18+
Prediction commentary
Based on data as of 9 Sep, 16:40Litvínov U20 to win, 52% confidence.
The model expects Litvínov to score 3.4 goals and Poruba 2.8, a spread that favours the home side. That expectation rests on the teams' recent scoring patterns: Litvínov have netted 14 goals in their last five matches compared to 18 conceded, while Poruba have managed 13 goals for and 22 against. The model's figures suggest a match with plenty of activity — 90% chance both teams score, 94% for three or more goals in total.
Both teams sit level on the table after two ELJ matches, each with one win and one loss and two points. Litvínov occupy 8th place, Poruba 7th. The gap is negligible, but the quality of those results differs. Litvínov beat Liberec Bílí Tygři 3:2 away on 4 September and lost to Mladá Boleslav 2:3 on 5 September. Poruba defeated Kladno 4:3 at home on 4 September but fell to Sparta Prague 5:6 at home on 5 September. The home side's recent victories have come against slightly stronger opposition.
The narrow margins create a psychological hurdle, yet the projection suggests a shift in dynamics this time.
The three most likely scorelines from the model are 3:2, 3:3 and 2:2, each at 5%. A 3:3 result would give Poruba the point they need to climb above Litvínov, and given their reliance on end-to-end chaos, that remains the main threat to this conclusion. If Poruba hold the game at 1:1 through the first period, the model's edge evaporates quickly.
Litvínov's last five matches show two wins and three losses. Poruba's last five contain one win and four losses. The difference in defensive vulnerability is notable — Poruba have conceded more than twice as many goals in the same number of fixtures. That statistical gap supports the model's higher expected goal total for the home side.
The draw probability sits at just 16%, the lowest of the three likely outcomes. When the model assigns such a low chance to a stalemate, it typically reflects an expectation of decisive attacking play from one side. Litvínov's 3.4 expected goals indicate the home side should create more clear-cut chances than Poruba's 2.8 suggests they will receive.