Volleyligaen Women
Prediction for Farum Women — Aalborg Volley Women
70%
Read more
Anyang Jung Kwan Jang Red Boosters
LG Sakers
Prediction for
Win: LG Sakers
52%
probability
Outcome probabilities (1X2) · by our model
Prediction fixed and will not change after kick-off
Form last 5 matches
Head to head 24
Bookmaker market
No bookmaker data
Prediction for Farum Women — Aalborg Volley Women
Prediction for Piotrcovia Women — Ruch Kalisz Women
Prediction for LUGI HF Women — AIK Women
Analytical content. Not a call to gamble. 18+
Prediction commentary
Based on data as of 9 Oct, 06:05LG Sakers to win, 52% confidence.
The model puts both sides on essentially the same level: 72 points for Anyang, 72.4 for LG Sakers. That quarter-point margin is where the edge lies, and it is enough to tip the scale toward the visitors.
Anyang have been sharper lately. Four wins in their last five matches, conceding 373 points while scoring 385. The only blemish came on 9 October against Seoul Thunders, a 58-66 defeat away from home. They won comfortably at home against Mobis Phoebus (88-85) and Suwon KT Sonicboom (75-72) in the KBL Cup, and picked up two road victories as well. Their recent record is 4-1, with 12 points from five games.
LG Sakers are less consistent but have scored more freely. Three wins and two losses in their last five, with 443 points scored and 424 conceded. They beat Wonju DB 96-92 on 8 October and KCC Egis 103-68 on 3 October, but lost to Suwon KT Sonicboom (72-97) and Mobis Phoebus (84-85). All five matches were away from home, which adds a layer of difficulty they have managed to navigate.
The head-to-head record is perfectly balanced. Six meetings since October 2025, three wins each. At LG Sakers' venue they have split two wins apiece. At Anyang, the visitors have won twice in the last three visits: 78-70 on 16 November 2025 and 77-69 on 8 February 2026. Anyang's only home victory in that period came on 31 March 2026, 84-74.
LG Sakers average more from distance. Their successful three-pointers average 11.67 per game across four matches, compared with Anyang's 5.5. They also generate more rebounds (34.5 versus 30.5) and more free throws (15 versus 10.5). The statistical profile suggests LG Sakers can control the tempo if they find their range.
This prediction fails if Anyang's three-point shooting improves. Their average of 5.5 makes them vulnerable to a side that can score from distance. A poor shooting night from LG Sakers or a hot streak from Anyang on the perimeter would shift the balance entirely. The model's quarter-point margin offers no cushion against variance.